Psuedo-Progressives: Picking and Choosing What Oppressions to Hate

It fucking pisses me off that these idiots can call themselves "progressive" when they support oppression and slavery. And that's what it is -- because the animals are living for reason not decided by themselves, they are slaves. They cannot choose to have their own lives because they are controlled by someone not necessarily stronger than they are, just with more tools to hurt them.

We see this everywhere -- a lot of the time we get more flak from pseudo-progressives than from the right-wingers. The right-wingers, at least, are perfectly secure in doing whatever they want, and they're [i]ignorant.[/i] The psuedo-progressives have no such innocence. They know what goes on, they know the torture and horror and pain that these animals face, and they don't care. Worse, they have the gall to feel superior about torturing, raping, and killing these creatures; they have the gall to feel superior to creatures that would be infinitely more kind if they were only given the chance. These creatures would not harm us. These creatures would not cage, enslave, and torture us; and yet somehow, because we are able to do these things to them and see nothing wrong with it, we are "superior"?

Sounds scarily Patriarchal to me. "If you're strong enough to subjugate someone, you deserve to." I've actually heard this line.

And isn't that just grand. I see "progressives", "feminists" all participating in the same system they hate -- the system of "might makes right." If you claim to be better than animals, you damn well better act like it and not indulge in frivolous cruelty. And even then nonhuman persons are better than you are: they never indulge in frivolous cruelty. Even the cat, terrorising a mouse, has a purpose to the play; though the cat may be amused by this (and probably is), she/he is not trying to excuse his/her behaviour. Cats, I know, are notoriously matter-of-fact. They are what they are, so fuck you if you don't like it -- now pet me.

Nonhuman animals are morally superior ten times over to these knowing "progressives". They do not kill because they like the taste; they kill because they must eat; taste, while it may factor into the decision, does not make up the whole of the decision; their killing is purely necessary.

For humans it is not; it is detrimental to human health to produce and eat stolen flesh. I say "produce" as well because the slaughterhouse workers are horrendously abused in the industry -- and you claim to be for humans when you feed your children this decaying flesh? HAH. I laugh at your stupidity.

Stop calling yourself a "progressive". You are Patriarchal, anti-human, and illogical to boot. You put shame to the overrated glory of humanity.